Hiển thị các bài đăng có nhãn funding. Hiển thị tất cả bài đăng
Hiển thị các bài đăng có nhãn funding. Hiển thị tất cả bài đăng

Thứ Tư, 15 tháng 5, 2013

Jewish Group: IRS Targeted Us Because ‘They Thought We Might Be Funding Terrorism’

Pro Israel Jewish Group Z Street: IRS Told Us Worries About Terrorism Held Up ApplicationZ Street

Lori Lowenthal Marcus, President of Z Street, appears on "On the Record." (Photo: Fox News)

Soon after the Internal Revenue Service admitted it had been targeting conservative organizations applying for 501 (c) (4) status around the 2012 election -- though it was later discovered it had been happening since at least 2010 -- it was learned that Jewish groups had also faced similar scrutiny.

Now, we are learning that at least one group was told it was because of purported worries they were funding terrorism.

Z Street has been vocal about the treatment it received after battling with the IRS for years.  It filed a lawsuit against the government entity in 2010 alleging viewpoint discrimination after applying for 501 (c) (3) status in 2009 (processed through the same office as 501 (c) (4)).

Lori Lowenthal Marcus, president of Z Street, appeared on "On the Record" with Greta Van Susteren Tuesday to explain the situation.

"After we filed our lawsuit, the IRS began having several different positions on why it was taking so long, one of which was because terrorism happens in Israel.  Therefore, they had to look into our organization, because they thought we might be funding terrorism.  We are a purely educational entity.  We didn't fund anybody; we barely funded ourselves!"

When Greta asked whether anyone in her group has been arrested for terrorism, whether their assets have ever been frozen in connection with terrorism, or whether the group has ever even been accused of promoting terrorist activity, the president incredulously replied, "No!"

If that's not enough, the group only filed the suit after their lawyer was told by the IRS that groups connected to Israel receive special scrutiny, and that some are sent to a special unit to determine whether the organization's positions contradict those of the administration's."

"At that point we knew that is classic viewpoint discrimination, and we had to [take] action," she said.

Their group has still not been approved for the 501 (c) (3) status it applied for in 2009.

Watch the entire interview, below:

Watch the latest video at video.foxnews.com

The POLITICO did some investigating on the matter, writing:

Legal filings show that the problems for Z Street -- and apparently for other Israel-related groups -- stemmed from an obscure unit in the Cincinnati IRS office: the "Touch and Go Group." One of the so-called TAG Group's duties was to weed out applications that might be coming from organizations which might be used to fund terrorism. In response to Z Street's lawsuit, an IRS manager acknowledged that applications mentioning Israel were getting special attention. "Israel is one of many Middle Eastern countries that have a 'higher risk of terrorism,'" wrote Jon Waddell, manager of the IRS's Exempt Organizations Determinations Group. "A referral to TAG is appropriate whenever an application mentions providing resources to organizations in a country with a higher risk of terrorism."

A spokesman for the Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration declined to say Monday whether that office had reviewed the issue of scrutiny of Israel-related groups as part of the review of how the IRS handled political groups, or separately. "I don't have any information for you one way or the other on that," said the spokesman, David Barnes. [Emphasis added]

When Z Street went to court though, the government denied its views on Israel or the Obama administration had anything to do with why it was transferred to the TAG Group.

-

Related:


View the original article here

Thứ Ba, 7 tháng 5, 2013

Louisiana Voucher Remains Legal, AFC Urges Legislature to Resolve Funding Issue

WASHINGTON, May 7, 2013 /PRNewswire-USNewswire/ -- The American Federation for Children, the nation's voice for educational choice, today urged the Louisiana Legislature and Governor to find a legislative solution after the Louisiana Supreme Court struck down the current funding mechanism for state's voucher program. The Court only ruled against the funding of the voucher program and did not strike down the constitutionality of the program.

"Vouchers remain constitutional and we encourage the Legislature and Governor to act quickly to resolve the funding issue caused by today's ruling," said Kevin P. Chavous, executive counsel for the American Federation of Children. "Louisiana's Scholarship Program has received support from nearly 93 percent of parents who have children enrolled in the program and currently more than 8,000 children are depending on legislative leaders to support Louisiana's popular school choice program."

A survey by the Black Alliance for Educational Options and the Louisiana Federation for Children disclosed that nearly 93 percent of the parents of scholarship students were very satisfied with the program while nearly 94 percent of parents are very satisfied with academic programs available to their children.

"We're disappointed in the Court's ruling, but we are both optimistic and committed to seeing a legislative solution, as well as confident in knowing that the litigation process has deemed the voucher program constitutional," added Chavous.

The ruling comes just a week after the Louisiana Department of Education announced scholarship awards to nearly 8,000 students in 32 parishes across the state for the upcoming school year. Currently, there are nearly 5,000 students enrolled in 119 participating schools.

SOURCE American Federation for Children


View the original article here